Home | About TeamAsia | Clients | Job Opportunities | Speaker Opportunities | Contact Us | Sign Up  
Home > Media Articles >   2004 > No Time for Stupid Rules
< Back   

 

 

All in a Day's Work
By Michael Alan Hamlin
May 17, 2004

Last Monday, my wife and I expected, would be a day of mostly rest. We planned to drive to her precinct early and be there by 7:00 am. Every year since we've known each other this has been our custom, with the objective of completing Monette's national obligation first thing in the morning, so that we have the rest of the day. Most of the time, ironically, it hasn't worked out that way.

One year the teachers didn't show up at her precinct, so in her customary fashion Monette took over their job, including organizing other volunteers to help. Instead of being out of the precinct within an hour of our arrival, as we'd expected, we finally got home around 5:00 am. She had manned the precinct until it closed, helped tabulate the votes, escorted them to the Parañaque City Hall, and then safeguarded them until they had been turned over in tact.

One particularly interesting moment in this process was the attempt by an armed soldier to stop the bus in which Monette and the other precinct volunteers were riding on the way to the City Hall. I was trailing behind in my car, and when the soldier signaled the bus, I got out and asked what the problem was. My wife tells me the sight of a foreigner on a Parañaque backstreet at midnight startled the soldier, and he waved the bus on. Who knows?

My wife was tense this year because she had not been able to find her name on FindPrecinct.com. This was especially puzzling because she had validated her registration last year. Being the positive thinker I am, I assumed she'd find it at her usual precinct, and we set off early in the morning with two of our household staff who had also validated their registrations. But her name wasn't on the list, and neither was the name of one of our staff. From being tense, my wife now began to transition to slow simmer.

Someone in charge of the precinct told her to go to the BF precinct to see if her name was there, since some names had been transferred. We went, but again were disappointed. On the advice of precinct officials in BF, we next set off for the local office of the Commission on Elections (Comelec), and came across a state of pure pandemonium. Angry citizens - mostly screaming insults hurled at Comelec - were 10 deep trying to retrieve authorization papers so they could vote. Someone barricaded in the building was calling out names of individuals whose names had been located.

When Monette asked how long people had been waiting, she was told two hours. But then a neighbor happened by who said she had seen my wife's name at the precinct we started out at in the morning. Hoping somewhat irrationally that Monette's name had mysteriously appeared on the lists after all - or she'd just missed it - we dashed back to the precinct only to be disappointed yet again. Then it was back to the Comelec office, where Monette learned definitively that she was not on any list. In fact, she was told that many of the validated names had been erased. No reason was given.

This is the first time my wife has missed voting. And she feels robbed as a result, and that feeling is certainly justified, in my view. Her day in many ways was symbolic of the chaos that reigned nationwide, for which there were many reasons. Some of them have to do with sheer incompetence if not criminal negligence by some present and former Comelec officials. I'm sure you know the names.

The decision to junk electronic ballot casting in favor of an antiquated manual system literally weeks before the election probably contributed as well. Or was this part of some massive scheme to add the missing voters' names to final tallies meant to artificially inflate the results for some chosen candidate? The turtle-like pace of the so-called quick count by the National Citizen's Movement for Free Elections (Namfrel) acted like a spark in a dry forest amidst this speculation, igniting waves of fearful conjecture that the election results were indeed being manipulated.

In fact, I've seen no evidence that they were, although there are plenty of political warlords boasting about how they delivered the vote to favored candidates. Religious sect leaders like making these boasts, too. But I've been observing elections in the Philippines for a couple of decades, and I've never seen anything that would convince me either politicians or religious leaders have anywhere near the clout they claim.

As the count dragged on and my wife continued to mourn her lost right to vote, a friend said of the episode, "It's flabbergasting, and made to look even sillier by the Indians, who managed to count all their 250 million votes in about a day." That's a sobering thought, indeed. If the Indians can count 250 million that quickly, shouldn't the Philippines be able to count less than a fifth as many within that time?

Whatever the reasons my wife and thousands of others were denied an inherent privilege, it's truly important not to let it happen again. Elections do need to be modernized, and hopefully whoever wins this one will make sure his or her successor is elected properly, and not just properly elected.

(Michael Alan Hamlin is the managing director of consultancy TeamAsia and the author of three books on Asian economies and companies. His latest book is Marketing Asian Places, of which he is a co-author (Wiley, 2001), and he is currently at work on High Visibility: The Making and Marketing of Asian Professionals into Celebrities. Write him at mahamlin@teamasia.com.).

Copyright © 2003 Michael Alan Hamlin. All Rights Reserved.

Back to prevous page


Media Archives

Copyright © 2004 TeamAsia and Hamlin-Iturralde Corporation. All rights reserved.